Stonemen Group, Inc. v. Metalforming Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and Defendant’s motion in limine. Defendant filed both motions on January 30, 2004. For the following reasons, the Court will deny both motions.
I. BACKGROUND
This action involves the issue of whether Defendant owes sales commissions to Plaintiff. The amended complaint contains two counts: (1) breach of contract and (2) violation of the Michigan’s Sale Representative Commissions Act under Michigan…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023