Legal Opinion

Parrish v. United Bank of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 13, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 89-0198PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The sole issue is whether a release signed by appellants precluded them from subsequently suing the bank.

We consider the facts in the light most favorable to appellants. Matter of Estate of Kerr, 137 Ariz. 25, 667 P.2d 1351 (App. 1983). In February 1984, appellants (Parrish) approached appellee (bank) for a loan to develop Gardner Mobile Home Estates. The bank’s assistant vice-president, George Rex, advised Parrish that the bank would not consider the loan because he had no experience as a contractor and suggested…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Witt v. WatkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dansby v. BuckArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Maxwell's Electric, Inc. v. Hegeman-Harris Co. of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Hendricks v. SimperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Balmer v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Motors v. JacksonNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Spain v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Inter-Tel, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Lubin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Cumis Ins. Society, Inc. v. Merrick Bank Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API