Legal Opinion

Edlund v. 4-S, LLC

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2005No. A-03-1425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cassel, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Eleanor M. Edlund brought this action pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 34-301 (Reissue 2004) to ascertain and establish the corners and boundaries between her land and the land of 4-S, LLC. The parties agree that the controlling boundary is the thread of the stream of the Platte River, main channel, but disagree on the location of such thread. Both parties claim land by accretion — ■ Edlund from the south bank and 4-S from the north bank. Following a bench trial, the court rejected 4-S’ defense asserting adverse possession and determined that the boundary was a line…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Anderson v. CumpstonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Demerath v. Knights of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Omega Chemical Co., Inc. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MatzenNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Lucerne Canal and Power Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. v. PollmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API