Legal Opinion

Haug v. Hewitt

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for leave to compromise claim on behalf of infant.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

In this case, an action brought on behalf of an infant, I am asked to approve a settlement agreed upon between the plaintiff’s special guardian and the defendant, and to direct that the amount thereof, less attorney’s fees, be paid to the infant’s general guardian, who, as I understand from counsel’s statement, has' been appointed by the Surrogate’s Court, without bond, pursuant to the provisions of section 2650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as enacted in the Surrogate’s Practice Act of 1914 (Laws of 1914, chap. 520), which took effect on September first. In *68my opinion it is not for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. In Re the Appointment of a General Guardian of HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Cornelius v. CallanNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Veeder v. HorstmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HirshfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  2. Benson v. SiemonsNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Duncan v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  4. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API