Legal Opinion

Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1964No. Civ. No. 27371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J. pro tem.*

Appeal by plaintiff corporations from that portion of a judgment awarding defendants costs of suit and costs of appeal against Albert Teitelbaum, individually, who is not a party to the action.

*81In this action to recover under contracts of insurance for losses allegedly arising out of a robbery, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for new trial and denied defendants ’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs appealed from the order granting a new trial and defendants appealed from the judgment. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fisher v. Nash Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Dennis v. Table Mountain Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Winter v. GnaizdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Canaan Taiwanese Christian Church v. All World Mission MinistriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API