Winhoven v. Swope
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal 'from an order dismissing Winhoven’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. The application alleged that in his trial on an indictment charging a violation of Section 320 of 18 U.S.C. 1 in the robbery of one H. C. McCloy, a postal clerk, he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel, in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution. The district court issued an order to show cause and heard and decided the application on the merits of this contention, holding that Winhoven had not been denied such assistance of counsel.
Winhoven seeks our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Jones v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Wright v. JohnstonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Leguillou v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Paul J. Madigan, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California v. Selvie W. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Mitchell v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Robinson v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Madsen v. HinshawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.