Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 7, 2000No. ARMY 9600413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*746OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

CASIDA, Judge:

HISTORY

A general court-martial composed of officers convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of attempted larceny, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer (four specifications), violation of a lawful general regulation (four specifications), larceny (twenty-nine specifications) and wrongful appropriation, forgery (four specifications), making and uttering checks without sufficient funds (four specifications), conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman (twenty-eight specifications), obtaining services under false pretenses, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. DuboseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. Private E1 OSHEA D. MILLERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API