Legal Opinion

Madison v. LaSene

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1954No. 32736PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This is an action by Lloyd L. Madison to enjoin Andrew H. LaSene and his son Ray LaSene from engaging in the upholstery business and from using the name LaSene in connection therewith. The findings of fact made by the trial court, which are accepted as the facts of the case, may be summarized as follows:

For twenty-eight years prior to April 7, 1952, Andrew H. LaSene engaged in the upholstery business in Kelso, Washington, under the name “LaSene’s Custom Upholstery.” During the last fourteen years he conducted that business at 1012 north Second avenue.

He entered into a written agreement with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garrett v. T. H. Garrett & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Lyle v. HaskinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Merager v. TurnbullWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Westphal v. Westphal's World's Best CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Westphal v. Westphal's World's Best Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Shore Restaurant Corp. v. TurkSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Kasco Services Corp. v. BensonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuayColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. McCart v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API