People v. Matthew A.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.—
SUMMARY
The juvenile court declared appellant Matthew A. a ward of the court after finding that he had committed a first degree burglary. The court placed appellant home on probation, and set a maximum term of confinement of six years.
Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the juvenile court’s finding he had committed burglary. In particular, he argues the evidence did not show he intended to steal at the time he entered the victim’s residence. Appellant also contends the court erred by setting a maximum term of confinement.
We strike the maximum term of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CejaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. Leanna W.California Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. SampleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. P.A.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. MoomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Christopher F.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. A.C.California Court of Appeal · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.