Legal Opinion
People v. Christopher F.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 2011No. B220546PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Christopher F. was declared a ward of the juvenile court and ordered home on probation after the court found him mentally competent *465and sustained a petition alleging he had made criminal threats against his high school dean. On appeal Christopher contends the court committed prejudicial error by failing to appoint the director of the regional center for the developmentally disabled (regional center director), as required by Penal Code section 1369, subdivision (a).1 He also contends the court focused on the wrong factors in determining his mental competence and, as a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. R.V.California Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. Alejandro G.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bryan E. v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re A.D. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re F v. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.