Taylor v. ConverseNow Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIZA TAYLOR, Case No. 25-cv-00990-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 CONVERSENOW TECHNOLOGIES, Re: Dkt. No. 21 INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Defendant ConverseNow Technologies, Inc. has moved to dismiss plaintiff Eliza Taylor’s 14 class action complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court found this matter appropriate 15 for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the 16 Court DENIES defendant’s motion. 17 18 BACKGROUND 19…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.