Legal Opinion

Marposs Corp. v. City of Troy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1994No. Docket 137121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

This is an action challenging defendant’s refusal to consent to a tax abatement under *159the Technology Park Development Act, MCL 207.701 et seq.) MSA 7.800(101), et seq.

Plaintiff sought to move its facilities from defendant, City of Troy, to a technology park in the City of Auburn Hills. The City of Auburn Hills offered plaintiff a tax abatement under the statute. However, under the statute, defendant’s consent was required before plaintiff could actually be granted the tax abatement. Defendant objected to the move and thereby blocked the abatement, though not the move.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Arlan's Department Stores, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Petrus v. Dickinson County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bendix Safety Restraints Group, Allied Signal, Inc v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. TolbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Celadon Trucking Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Fraser Township v. Linwood-Bay Sportsman's ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API