Marposs Corp. v. City of Troy
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
This is an action challenging defendant’s refusal to consent to a tax abatement under *159the Technology Park Development Act, MCL 207.701 et seq.) MSA 7.800(101), et seq.
Plaintiff sought to move its facilities from defendant, City of Troy, to a technology park in the City of Auburn Hills. The City of Auburn Hills offered plaintiff a tax abatement under the statute. However, under the statute, defendant’s consent was required before plaintiff could actually be granted the tax abatement. Defendant objected to the move and thereby blocked the abatement, though not the move.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Arlan's Department Stores, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Petrus v. Dickinson County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Bendix Safety Restraints Group, Allied Signal, Inc v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. TolbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Celadon Trucking Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Fraser Township v. Linwood-Bay Sportsman's ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.