Krivan v. Hourican
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This is an action for damages for the death of Thomas M. DeHass, alleged to have been caused by negligence of the defendant. The decedent’s domicile was in Pennsylvania; his widow and children and the defendant are all citizens of that stat.e. The plaintiff is a citizen of Ohio and has been duly appointed administrator of the estate. Diversity of citizenship is the sole basis for jurisdiction of this court.
The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, attacking the court’s jurisdiction, in which he contends(a) The real parties in interest in this action are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hyde v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Jaffe v. Philadelphia & Western R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nigro v. BlumbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974