Legal Opinion
State v. Mondo
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1982No. Cr. 849-852PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by the State, authorized by § 29-28-07(5), NDCC, from an order granting a motion to suppress evidence. We reverse.
On November 6, 1981, a Dickinson police officer investigated a report of sexual imposition that allegedly occurred on November 5, 1981, at the apartment of Joseph Mondo and Terry Bates. The victim said that she had been raped by Mondo, and that she had seen what she was told was marijuana at Mondo’s apartment. Based upon this information, the officer sought both a warrant for the arrest of Mondo for sexual imposition (Rule 4, NDRCrimP), and a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.