Hawkins v. Kiely
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
JOHN H. RICH III, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Robert Kiely and Envirem Technologies, Inc. move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) for a more definite statement of the claims of plaintiffs Benjamin Hawkins and Bruce Cort against them. See Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement (“Motion”) (Docket No. 4) at 1. For the reasons that follow, I grant the Motion.
I. Applicable Legal Standard
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) provides, in relevant part: “A party may move for a more definite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. KooistraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Hackman v. Dickerson Realtors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Bishop v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Haghkerdar v. Husson CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maria Cirino v. Kenneth J. Horgan and Kevin Scott BenteDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
- REICHERT v. ABBOTTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Raven Torres-Torres v. Roberto Revol Martínez-Lebron, Update Music Corp., et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026