Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Kiely

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 19, 2008No. Civil No. 08-139-P-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

JOHN H. RICH III, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants Robert Kiely and Envirem Technologies, Inc. move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) for a more definite statement of the claims of plaintiffs Benjamin Hawkins and Bruce Cort against them. See Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement (“Motion”) (Docket No. 4) at 1. For the reasons that follow, I grant the Motion.

I. Applicable Legal Standard

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) provides, in relevant part: “A party may move for a more definite…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. KooistraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Hackman v. Dickerson Realtors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Bishop v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  4. Haghkerdar v. Husson CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maria Cirino v. Kenneth J. Horgan and Kevin Scott BenteDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
  2. REICHERT v. ABBOTTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  3. Raven Torres-Torres v. Roberto Revol Martínez-Lebron, Update Music Corp., et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API