Donahue v. Borough of Punxsutawney
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This case was submitted without oral argument, and seems to have been determined below on the iindenied facts stated in the petition of the appellant and in the answer of the borough; we shall therefore so consider it in the light of the briefs filed.
An ordinance was passed and approved, August 14, 1923, entitled “An ordinance for the extension of Water Street.” In its first section, the extension was minutely described by metes and bounds; it provided for an extension of the existing Water Street, 50 feet wide, across land of Chris Dunmire, W. M. Donahue, the petitioner,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Mutual Life Ins. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- City of Corry v. Corry Chair Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. Beaver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Ayars v. Wyoming Valley Homeopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Frederick StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Donahue v. Punxsutawney BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Wilkes-Barre AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Borough of Punxsutawney v. DonahueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Frackville Sewerage Co. v. JonesSchuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1937
- In re Ordinance No. 203 of Barnesboro BoroughCambria County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.