Legal Opinion

Penn v. USF Holland, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 16, 2010No. Civil Action CV-09-S-00203-NEPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

C. LYNWOOD SMITH, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiff asserts claims against USF Holland, Inc., his current employer, under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), for disparate treatment, hostile work environment, and retaliation. 1 Defendant has moved for summary judgment as to all of plaintiffs claims. 2 Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and evidentiary submissions, the court concludes that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is due to be granted. Plaintiffs motion to strike the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API