Legal Opinion

Eckel v. C. T. Patterson Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1973No. 5235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is a suit for personal injuries resulting from a vehicular accident. The defendants are Charles Smith, driver of one of the vehicles involved, C. T. Patterson Co., Inc., Smith’s employer, and their insurer, Gulf Insurance Company. Defendants’ answer denies liability and alternatively pleads contributory negligence. American Can Company, plaintiff’s employer, a self-insurer under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act, intervened for workmen’s compensation, including medical expenses, which it had paid.

Following trial on the merits judgment was rendered in favor' of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gaspard v. LeMaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. Lomenick v. SchoefflerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. Barker v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Orfanello v. Pepsi Cola Bottling CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API