Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blocker v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1999Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the intention of the parties is determinative of whether an article is a fixture regardless of whether the article is attached or affixed to the land.

Wendy Blocker (Plaintiff) attended a performance at the Robin Hood Dell East outdoor concert hall (the Dell) in the City of Philadelphia (City). Plaintiff, using a general admission ticket, chose to sit in the middle of the fourth tier on one of two wooden bleachers in the Dell’s lawn area. Shortly thereafter, the wooden bleacher collapsed and Plaintiff fell backward to the *192ground. As a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Noll by Noll v. Harrisburg Area YMCASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Grieff v. ReisingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Canon-McMillan School District v. BioniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API