Legal Opinion

Giano v. Salvatore

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 17, 2012No. AC 33512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The defendant Vanna Salvatore1 appeals from the default judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, John Giano, and from the denial of the defendant’s motion to open that judgment. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court abused its discretion by (1) deciding the defendant’s motion to open the judgment before considering her motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) granting the plaintiffs motion for judgment, and (3) denying the defendant’s motion to open the judgment.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*836The following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Burns v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Rathbun v. HEALTH NET OF NORTHEAST, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Worth v. KORTAConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Wilson v. TroxlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dziedzic v. Pine Island Marina, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Dunn v. EtzelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
  4. Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLC (Dissent)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
  5. Multilingual Consultant Associates, LLC v. NgohConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API