Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Christopher J. Bruno v. Jennifer M. Medley, Individually and "Jennifer M. Medley Campaign Fund"

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 2020No. 2020-CA-0515Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CHRISTOPHER J. BRUNO * NO. 2020-CA-0515 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JENNIFER M. MEDLEY, * FOURTH CIRCUIT INDIVIDUALLY AND "JENNIFER M. MEDLEY * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAMPAIGN FUND" * * ******* DNA ATKINS, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT WITH REASONS I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s judgment granting the preliminary injunction. After review of the record, I do not consider this appeal to be frivolous. Accordingly, I find that Judge Bruno’s request for frivolous appeal damages under La. C.C.P. art. 2164 should be denied. Recently, in Ellison v. Romero, 2020-0376, p. 13 (La.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miralda v. GonzalezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Dugas v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Sherman of Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. City of Ruston v. PerrittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Hunter v. MAXIMUM GROUP BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API