United States v. Hamilton
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TERENCE KERN, United States District Judge
Before, the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,' or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“2255 Motion”) (Doc. 28).
I. Factual Background
In 2005, Defendant ■ Raymond Mark Hamilton pled guilty to possession of a firearm and ammunition after a felony conviction, which would typically carry a ten-year maximum sentence. Based on facts set forth in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”), the Court found Defendant had seven prior convictions for violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and classified…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Thrower v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ervin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Farkas v. KizziahDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.