Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamilton

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 2017No. Case No. 06-CR-188-TCKPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE KERN, United States District Judge

Before, the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,' or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“2255 Motion”) (Doc. 28).

I. Factual Background

In 2005, Defendant ■ Raymond Mark Hamilton pled guilty to possession of a firearm and ammunition after a felony conviction, which would typically carry a ten-year maximum sentence. Based on facts set forth in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”), the Court found Defendant had seven prior convictions for violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and classified…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Thrower v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. Ervin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  4. Farkas v. KizziahDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API