Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Kizziah

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided July 16, 2019No. 7:18-cv-00043Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE MITCHELL LEON FARKAS, Petitioner, Civil No. 7: 18-43-KKC V. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY KIZZIAH, Warden, Respondent. *** *** *** *** Inmate Mitchell Farkas has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Farkas argues that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathis v. United States,

136 S. Ct. 2243

(2016), his 2004 and 2006 federal sentences should not have been enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (“ACCA”) based upon his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API