Legal Opinion

United States v. Byron Still

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1996No. 96-30009PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Byron Still pleaded guilty to six counts in a second superseding indictment. Still appeals his guilty pleas to counts one and two on the ground that the district court failed to advise him of the correct mandatory minimum sentence applicable to count one. He also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to count three. We affirm in part and vacate in part, remanding to enable Still to replead to count one.

I

Jose Bartolo Menjivar arranged for Jorge Salgado III and a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) cooperating individual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Jose Alvaro GalloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Guilmette v. HowesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Kelvin Mondale NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API