Legal Opinion
United States v. Cox
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1996No. 95-1108PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In denying relief, the district court determined that all issues either were raised and ruled on at trial hr on direct appeal or that defendant failed to demonstrate cause for failing to raise the issues at trial or on direct appeal. On appeal, defendant argues that the district court erred in denying § 2255 relief because (1) his sentence was invalid since prior convictions used to enhance his sentence were subsequently vacated, set…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- United States v. PettifordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CockerhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Byron StillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.