Mainelli v. Providence Journal Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
DAY, District Judge.
This matter is now before me for a determination, under the provisions of Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., of the sufficiency of the “First Defense” asserted in the defendant’s answer to each of the four remaining counts of the plaintiff’s complaint. As originally filed said complaint contained five counts, the fifth of which was dismissed by me upon defendant’s motion for lack of federal jurisdiction. Mainelli v. Providence Journal Company, 1962, D.C.R.I., 201 F.Supp. 7. Said “First Defense” is that each of said four counts “fails to state…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- William L. Hanna v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Jacobson v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Scherer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Burch v. SniderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Harberson v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994