Legal Opinion

Baer v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 8012SC40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that it is the statute of limitations established by G.S. 28A-19-3 (a) which is pertinent to this case, and not that of G.S. 28A-19-3 (b)(2). G.S. 28A-19-3 (a) applies to claims arising prior to a decedent’s death while G.S. 28A-19-3 (b)(2) applies to claims arising at or after his death.

However, plaintiffs argument is of no avail since the issue of the applicability of G.S. 28A-19-3 (a) was not raised before the trial court. See Wallace Men’s Wear, Inc. v. Harris, 28 N.C. App. 153, 220 S.E. 2d 390 (1975), cert. denied 289 N.C. 298, 222 S.E. 2d 703…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallace Men's Wear, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EnglishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Rheinberg-Kellerei GMBH v. Vineyard Wine Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Carethers v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Jarman v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API