Wallace Men's Wear, Inc. v. Harris

ARNOLD, Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant contends that it was error to admit into evidence the plaintiff’s itemized statement of account. He argues that the evidence is hearsay, and that the statement was not prepared contemporaneously with the purchase of the clothes and therefore does not come within the hearsay exception for business records. Plaintiff argues that the statement was timely prepáred and therefore admissible.

We need not rule on whether the itemized statement was timely prepared in this case because the defendant stipulated in the “Order on Pretrial Conference”…