Legal Opinion

Smith v. Walat Stutzman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1930No. Appeal 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiffs brought this action against George Walat and Walter A. Stutzman, Administrator of Joseph Walat, deceased, jointly, to recover for certain building material sold and delivered.

There was no denial that the supplies were purchased and delivered, but George (or Gregor) Walat denies that he was the purchaser and contends that he went to the store of the plaintiffs with his son who bought the materials. The court submitted to the jury, for their determination, the issues involved and gave in structions that a verdict could be rendered in favor of either of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Gable v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hoskinson v. EliotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Githers v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Lehigh National Bank v. SeyfriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bauman v. BittnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Arndt v. Brockhausen Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API