Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haimbach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1942No. Appeal, 322-321PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Defendant was charged with fraudulent conversion in one indictment and with embezzlement in two others. The charges were consolidated for trial before the same jury and defendant was convicted on all of them. He was sentenced only on bill No. 485 February Sessions 1942. Defendant has appealed from the judgment of sentence on that bill and also from the “recording of the verdict” in each of the other two cases, in which sentence was suspended. These latter appeals will be dismissed-

In general an appeal can be taken only after sentence. “After verdict and judgment thereon,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. RagoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Dominick Codispoti Y-1353 v. James F. Howard, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. PollickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. STAINOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API