Legal Opinion

Muolo v. Quintana

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 23, 2009No. 09-1213Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Francis A. Muolo, a federal prisoner, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he claims that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) wrongfully denied him eligibility for early release despite his participation in a substance abuse treatment program. More specifically, Muolo claims that the regulation the BOP applied to deny his eligibility for early release, 28 C.F.R. § 550.58(a)(l)(vi)(B) (2000), is invalid in light of two decisions from the United States…

3Cases cited12 opinions

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
Paulsen v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Feather O. Houstoun, Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association (Intervenor in d.c.) Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc., in No. 98-1879. v. Feather O. Houstoun Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association (Intervenor in d.c.) Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Feather O. Houstoun Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association (Intervenor in d.c.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.