Legal Opinion

United States v. Rondell Herbert Garrison

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1988No. 87-7649PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:

Rondell Herbert Garrison alleges that the prosecutor at his trial for bank robbery used peremptory strikes to remove black persons from his jury in a discriminatory manner, in violation of his fourteenth amendment rights as detailed in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987). The trial court held that the peremptory challenges were exercised for race-neutral reasons. Because the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Alicia Davis (85-1153), Duane Davis (85-1178), Kenneth Davis (85-1288), Howard Ransom (85-1366)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Carl FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Thorson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API