Legal Opinion

Tapia v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2001No. 45S03-0011-PC-708PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

A post-conviction court denied Jose Angel Tapia's request to withdraw without prejudice his petition for post-conviction relief. Tapia had no such right to withdraw his petition; our rules give post-conviction courts discretion in disposing of such request. We find no abuse of the post-conviction court's discretion here.

Background

The facts of petitioner Jose Angel Ta-pia's crime are detailed in our opinion on direct appeal. See Tapia v. State, 569 N.E.2d 655, 657 (Ind.1991). In short, Ta-pia was convicted of Murder 1 and Felony Murder 2 for killing a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. German v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Neeley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Raess v. DoescherIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. James Ripps v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Jose Guzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Green v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API