Legal Opinion

McFry v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 7 Div. 860PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBourdin, J.

Appellee treats the bill as one filed under Code, § 10390, new to the present Code. Its sufficiency is not questioned in argument on this appeal. In averment and prayer the bill is good as one to enforce the liens of registered judgments under Code, §§ 7874, 7875. Gurley v. Robertson, 178 Ala. 326, 59 So. 643.

We need not and do not decide whether it makes a case under Code, § 10390. Ex parte McFry (Ala. Sup.) 117 So. 464. The superiority of the judgment liens over the title of respondent, claiming through the judgment debtor after due registration, is not questioned.

Reversal of the decree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hodges v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Tobias v. Josiah Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Tygh v. DolanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Gardner v. Mobile & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Wheeler v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mauck v. Columbus Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thomas v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ex Parte McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Daniel v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County v. HudgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API