Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McFry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1929No. 7 Div. 810PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition, answer, exhibits, and the respective arguments of counsel show that only a question of cost is involved in the decision that is now sought.

After the court overruled the respondent’s demurrer (Ex parte McFry, 218 Ala. 21, 117 So. 464) to the petition, the respondent filed an answer setting up the final decree rendered on the 30th day .of June, 1928, ip, the proceeding in the circuit court, by O. L. Stewart against the petitioner et al., to. adjust the several or rival claims of the parties to the property involved in the claim suit described in petitioner’s petition for mandamus.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Case v. LyonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Agee v. CateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. County of Montgomery v. Montgomery Traction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  5. McFry v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Grant v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Underwood v. Alabama State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Arrington v. State Ex Rel. ParsonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Byrd v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API