Dixon County v. Halstead
Nebraska Supreme Court
■ Error to the district court for Dixon county. ■ Tried below before Crawford, J. Jones v. Seward County, 5 Neb., 561. Lynam v. Anderson, 9 Id., 376. Sumner & Co. v. Colfax County, 14 Id., 524.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
In May, 1886, the defendant returned to the assessor of Ponca, Dixon county, “ The amount of bonds and stocks of every kind, state -and county warrants, and other municipal securities, and shares of capital stock of joint stock, or other companies or corporations held as an in*699vestment in any way representing assets, the sum of $16,336.16,” and also returned the amount of bonds and other securities exempt by law from taxation, specifying the amount and kind of each, the same being included in the preceding fifth item, as follows:
“Nos. 66759\
39976
' 61797
5748
38902
49974
49494
18071|
64694 !
45438
14247
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- State ex rel. Goff v. County BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. County Commissioners of Seward CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Markham v. . CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Brown v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
- Bankers Life Insurance v. County BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Farmers Co-operative Creamery & Supply Co. v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Rosenbery v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.