Legal Opinion

Rosenbery v. Douglas County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1932No. 28423PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to enjoin the collection of an alleged void tax on realty. The district court denied any relief to plaintiff, and he has appealed.

Plaintiff is the owner of two lots in the city of Omaha. It is conceded that at the regular quadrennial assessment in 1930 the county assessor increased the assessed valuation of the two lots over the last previous assessment to the extent of $5,500; that no notice of such increase was given to plaintiff; that he had no knowledge of such increase in valuation until after the county board of equalization had finally adjourned, and that the tax was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Grant v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Spiech v. TierneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. County Commissioners v. Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. South Platte Land Co. v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gamboni v. County of OtoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Watson Bros. Realty v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Falotico v. Grant County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ganser v. County of LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API