Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oberson v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2007No. OP 06-0232Published

1DissentJustice Rice

¶38 The Court fails to properly apply rational basis review, inappropriately relies on Brewer to support its holding, and usurps the role of the legislature to create its own broad classification encompassing all “inherently dangerous sports.” For these reasons, I dissent.

¶39 Despite purporting to apply a rational basis review to the snowmobile liability statute, the Court fails to either enunciate or apply the proper standards for an equal protection challenge.

“The constitutionality of a legislative enactment is prima facie presumed, and every intendment in its favor will be presumed, unless…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API