Legal Opinion

Seminary v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1914No. 11845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered February 26, 1913, confirming an assessment roll, on appeal from eminent domain commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— This is an appeal by the Seattle Seminary, a corporation, from a judgment confirming an assessment roll, returned by the hoard of eminent domain commissioners. The purpose of the assessment is to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the city in condemning, appropriating, and damaging private property, for laying off, extending, and establishing West Bertona street from Third avenue west to Fifth *126avenue west, in the city of Seattle. The larger part of the property condemned was taken from the north end of the appellant’s property. The appellant’s property consists of an unplatted five^acre…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. FonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Spokane v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Seattle v. GattonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re West Wheeler StreetWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams County v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. City of Vancouver v. Corporation of the Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. City of Vancouver v. Corporation of the Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API