Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Vancouver v. Corporation of the Catholic Bishop
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1916No. 12471Published
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered May 18, 1911, confirming an assessment roll for a public improvement, after a hearing before the court.
1DissentHolcomb, J.
(dissenting) — X cannot escape the conviction that the assessments levied back against appellant’s property and the situation existing are extremely similar to those shown in In re West Bertona Street, 81 Wash. 125, 142 Pac. 483. Upon the reasoning in that case, this case should follow the same course. I therefore dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seminary v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914