Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Rainey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1892No. 30PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Bill by George W. and Thomas Herbert and others against W. J. Rainey to enjoin the erection and maintenance of a nuisance.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

The Youghiogheny River 031 Company, being the owner of a tract of land containing 34 acres, in or shortly before the year 1872, laid out the land into lots and streets, and called the place the town of Sedgwick. The streets were marked on the ground by stakes, and a draft or plan of the town was made by the company, and exhibited by its agent. This plan, it would_ seem, has been lost or mislaid.

By deed dated March 5, 1872, and duly recorded on October 29tb of the same year, the company convéyed to Elizabeth Dean one of the town lots, described in the deed as “all that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BassmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1905
  2. Faulks v. SchriderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API