Legal Opinion

White v. Boulia-Gorrell Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 23, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiff was a minor at the time of the accident. A release of all demands against the defendant was executed by the plaintiff’s father, who signed the release as the plaintiff’s “next friend.” This instrument is not a bar to the action. Roberts v. Hillsborough Mills, ante, 517.

There is no claim that the accident did not arise “out of and in the course of” the plaintiff’s employment. P. L., c. 178, s. 2. Since that employment exposed the plaintiff at times “to the dangers incident to proximity to machinery” he was an employee under class II of the statute and is “entitled to the benefit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boody v. K. & C. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Casey v. Frank Jones Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  3. Morin v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Regnier v. RandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. Arnold Wood Heel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API