Morin v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Petition, for a new trial, filed after the decision reported ante, 354. Upon the death of Lizotte, his administratrix appeared. The petition was granted upon the single issue of liability, and the defendant excepted. Transferred by Peaslee, J., from the May term, 1917, of the superior court. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the former decision in this case (ante, 354), it was held upon the facts then before the court that Lizotte could not recover under the statute (Laws 1911, c. 163, s. 1), because his employment in the defendant's mill did not require that any part of his work should be performed, in the language of the statute, "on, in connection with or in proximity to any hoisting apparatus, or any machinery propelled or operated by steam or other mechanical power." At the hearing upon the plaintiff's motion for a new trial it appeared that the deceased worked in a room where there was a movable elevator…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boody v. K. & C. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Olney v. RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Bell v. LampreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manchester St. Ry. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
- Casey v. Frank Jones Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- Eckhardt v. Jones' MarketOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Regnier v. RandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- White v. Boulia-Gorrell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.