Legal Opinion

Wright v. Dunn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 1991No. 90-312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the Superior Court’s CHampsey, J.) denial of their motion for additur or, in the alterna*670tive, for a new trial in their consolidated negligence actions against the defendant. The plaintiffs assert that the court abused its discretion in denying the motion after the jury chose to award no damages, although the defendant had stipulated to liability. We reverse the denial of the motion and remand.

The plaintiffs brought this action after a collision between the defendant’s vehicle and Mr. Wright’s pickup truck on January 22,1985. The parties stipulated that the accident…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Panas v. HarakisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Robert E. Tardiff, Inc. v. Twin Oaks Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Belanger v. TeagueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Lavoie v. BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ronayne v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Townsend v. LegereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API