Legal Opinion
Mays v. Dinwiddie
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2009No. 08-5129PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAIRE V. HENRY, Chief Judge.
Jerry Lee Mays, an Oklahoma state prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. The district court held that the burglary sentence that Mr. Mays sought to challenge had expired and that, as a result, he could not establish that he was “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court ... in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).
Mr. Mays now argues that pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Garlotte v. Fordice, 515 U.S. 39, 115 S.Ct. 1948, 132…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Klen v. City of Loveland, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Calhoun v. Colorado Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Reid v. PautlerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Arnaiz v. Warden, Federal Satellite LowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.