Claim of Stark v. Zimmerman
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE, Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission upholding the referee’s supplemental order denying petitioner disability benefits. We affirm.
Petitioner worked as a uranium miner from 1945 to 1960. From 1957 to 1960, his last three years as a miner, he was employed by Ben Zimmerman in Colorado. During the entire fifteen year period he worked as a miner he was exposed to silica dust, but his exposure to that dust ended in 1960, when he quit working as a miner.
In July 1972, petitioner was diagnosed as having silicosis. On March 2,1978, he filed a claim seeking…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevenson v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Matthews v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Ball v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Brantley v. Phoenix Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Berkeley Metropolitan District v. PolandColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Matter of Death of Kohler v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Movitz v. Division of Employment & TrainingColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Claim of Stark v. ZimmermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.