Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1951No. 12209PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

E. H. Briggs, the defendant below, has appealed from a judgment rendered on a *512jury verdict cancelling a royalty deed executed by appellees, Castulo and Clara Rodriguez, and awarding them a money judgment against appellant for $300 actual damages and $1,000 exemplary damages.

Appellant centers his attack here against that part of the judgment awarding money damages against him. By his first four points, appellant contends that the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that appellees’ claim for damages is barred by the two-year statute of limitations. Article 5526, Vernon’s Civil…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Glenn v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. LevyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Graham v. RoderTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Swearingen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Oliver v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1855

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Clements v. WithersTexas Supreme Court · 1969

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API