Legal Opinion

Ford v. Jindal

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 2022No. 2:19-cv-13207Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM J. FORD, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-13207 Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds v. Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris ROSILYN JINDAL, JUDY CRISENBERY, JANAK R. BHAVSAR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, CAMPBELL, LAURA BARTH, and DANIELLE WESTBAY, Defendants. _______________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION, ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING IN PART THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AUGUST 20, 2021 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [58], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API