Legal Opinion
Bodine v. Berg
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 4, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bergen, J.
The plaintiff, as assignee of the Mechanics’ and Traders’ Bank, Market Branch, of Brooklyn, New York, brought his suit against the defendants to recover the amount claimed to he clue on two promissory notes, the first of which is in the form following:
“$4,435.50. Brooklyn, N. Y., August 31, 1908.
“On demand, after date, T promise to pay to the order of Mechanics’ and Traders’ Bank, Market Branch, forty-four hundred and thirty-five and 50-100 dollars at Mechanics’ and Traders’ Bank, Market Branch. Value received.
“C. Berg,
“'Marie Berg.”
The other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. FrickeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Draper v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Hollingsworth v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Rader's Administrator v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Waln v. WalnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tremont Trust Co. v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Murphy-Bolanz Land & Loan Co. v. McKibbenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Crookum v. KetchumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McIntosh v. De FilippoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.