Legal Opinion
Espey v. Convenience Marketers
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 15, 1991No. 89-859Published
1Opinion of the Court
578 So.2d 1221 (1991)
James A. ESPEY, a minor, who sues By and Through his father and next friend and Guardian, James Q. ESPEY; and James Q. Espey
v.
CONVENIENCE MARKETERS, INC.
89-859.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 15, 1991.
Rehearing Denied April 5, 1991.
Joseph G. Pierce and Jack Drake of Drake, Knowles & Pierce, Tuscaloosa, for appellants.
J. Russell Gibson III and Michael S. Burroughs of Phelps, Owens, Jenkins, Gibson & Fowler, Tuscaloosa, for appellee.
KENNEDY, Justice.
James A. Espey, suing through his father and guardian, James Q. Espey; and James Q. Espey, individually, filed an action…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- John Deere Co. v. GambleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Clark v. Houston County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Sarlls v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.